
So, it was not surprising that it came up with only two new proposals: one is to create a Cabinet post dealing with #intelligence, a twin for the existing #Homeland #Security tsar. The other is a suggestion to spend #money on “improving the lives of disaffected youths in Arab and other #Muslim countries”.
I am not kidding! Less than 10 percent of the report, basically its Chapter II, was devoted to the key question: who were these terrorists, where did they come from, and what made them tick?
The report said:
“We learned about an enemy who is sophisticated, patient, disciplined, and lethal. The enemy rallies broad support in the #Arab and #Muslim world by demanding redress for #political #grievances, but its hostility towards us and our values is limitless.”
Leaving aside the odd syntax — obviously someone insisted that the last phrase be added – the #paragraph quoted above shows how the commission got on the wrong track. The report assumes that there was a single, readily identifiable enemy. This is the routine way of #political thinking, as shaped during the #ColdWar.
Anyone with #knowledge of the Arab countries and the #Muslim world in general would know that this is not the case. The problem with the 25-year war on #terror is precisely that the #democracies, and those Muslims who aspire after #democracy, are faced with a multi-faceted threat that assumes numerous forms.
–
