Tag: #Religious

Prophecy News Watch : The Constitution Must Come First In Government

America doesn’t require politicians to abandon their faith.

But there is an enormous difference between allowing faith to inform someone’s moral worldview and granting a religious legal system governmental authority.

The Constitution protects El-Sayed’s right to follow Sharia.

The same Constitution protects another American’s right to reject Sharia, criticize Sharia, leave Islam, evangelize Muslims and proclaim beliefs Islam considers profoundly offensive.

That distinction cannot become negotiable.

And this is where Christians especially should pay attention.

Religious liberty isn’t merely the freedom to worship quietly inside a building.

It includes the freedom to preach doctrines others consider offensive, change religions, evangelize, criticize competing religious claims and refuse religious requirements one does not believe.

Once government begins protecting religious doctrines from criticism—or allowing religious law to determine another person’s civil liberties—the foundation has shifted.

Prophecy News Watch : Sharia And The Constitution: The Question Abdul El-Sayed Needs To Answer

Abdul El-Sayed has attracted national attention after invoking Jesus Christ while defending political ideas critics describe as radical.

“Jesus, peace and blessings be upon him, was considered radical in his time too,” the Democratic nominee for Michigan’s U.S. Senate seat recently said.

But whether a Muslim politician accurately understands Jesus is not the most consequential question surrounding El-Sayed’s faith.

There is another question that reaches directly into the responsibilities of public office:

What role does Sharia play when a politician who considers it an obligation before God is making laws for Americans who do not believe in it?

That question deserves an answer because El-Sayed has previously described his adherence to Sharia in unusually serious terms.

While discussing his decision to obtain Sharia-compliant financing in a 2009 interview, El-Sayed explained:

“When I die, and I stand before God and go through everything I did in my life, I don’t want to say I did it the easy way instead of the Sharia-compliant way.”

Then came the important part:

“Not because of fear but because of obligation.”

That isn’t casual cultural identification.

It describes a religious conviction El-Sayed believes he will ultimately answer to God for.

Americans therefore have every right to ask what happens when that conviction enters the United States Senate.
–

Demon Buster : Where there is underground witchcraft and obvious witchcraft

👿Education –
💎parapsychology,
💎dungeons and dragons,
💎folklore,
💎mythology.

👿Entertainment –
💎rock music,
💎TV,
💎movies,
💎soap operas,
etc.

👿Lodges –
💎origins in witchcraft

👿Religious –
💎Protestant,
💎Catholic,
💎Cults,
💎World Council of Churches,
💎National Council of Churches,
💎Mormonism and other cults.

Religions – A person must remember that witchcraft is practiced in the name of Jesus Christ.

There are books on witchcraft that instruct the practitioner to perform the specified actions in the name of Jesus Christ.

II Corinthians 11:13-15 “For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ.

And no marvel; for satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.

Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works.”

Prophecy News Watch – The city of Hamtramck, Michigan is one of the first cities in the nation where Muslims make up the majority of the population.

And the all-Muslim city council decided that it would be a good idea to legalize the sacrifice of animals on residential property…

After several months of contentious debate and pressure from Muslim residents, Hamtramck City Council voted Tuesday night to allow the religious sacrifice of animals on residential property.

Muslims often slaughter animals during the holiday of Eid al-Adha and Hamtramck has one of the highest percentage of Muslim residents among cities in the U.S.

Science, Public Health Policy and the Law: ‘A win for the Amish is likely to be a win for all’.

By Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.

The Post reported last month that Miller v. McDonald and other cases challenging efforts to ban religious exemptions in California and West Virginia could result in a “national legal win” for opponents of vaccine mandates.

“If the court does rule in favor of religious exemptions to vaccines, unless there is some caveat to the ruling, a Supreme Court ruling would be binding nationwide and thereby eliminate state action to remove religious exemptions,” said Leslie Manookian, president and founder of the Health Freedom Defense Fund.

One caveat, according to Kane, would be whether the Supreme Court issues a ruling that is applicable only to specific groups, like the Amish, instead of having broader applicability.

“You can’t rule in favor of one religious group to have the right to an exemption but then declare another religious group does not share that same right,” Kane said. “There is a chance the court could rule narrowly on the specifics of this case, but that will be hard in my view. A win for the Amish is likely to be a win for all.”

Another caveat, according to Manookian, is the Supreme Court’s willingness to take on a case involving vaccination.

“I would hope that case ends up at the Supreme Court, but find it difficult to predict what the court will do as it seems committed to avoiding the vaccine issue,” Manookian said.

The cases come at a time when religious exemptions have become a contentious issue in several states and have resulted in conflicting court rulings — a situation Glaser said is confusing for many parents.

“The Miller case highlights a chaotic legal landscape where lawyers and families face direct legislative confusion,” Glaser said. “Lower courts will continue splitting over the Equal Protection Clause until the Supreme Court provides the explicit clarity required.”

Lion of Judah: THE ANTICHRIST JUST REVEALED HIMSELF IN LONDON.

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/T_NHpvgmB6I/maxresdefault.jpg

Lion of Judah
3.52M subscribers
48,820 views
Jul 23, 2026

Is the world being prepared for a single system of worship?

In this urgent message, we examine the controversy surrounding King Charles’s changing religious role, the rise of interfaith unity, the Abrahamic Family House, and the warning found in Revelation 13.

This sermon does not identify King Charles or any living person as the final Antichrist.

Instead, it explores how the spirit of antichrist weakens the exclusive truth of Jesus Christ and prepares humanity for global worship.

Scripture warns that the coming Beast will demand allegiance. Christians must remain awake, discerning, faithful, and unashamed of the Gospel of Christ.

Science, Public Health Policy and the Law: Legal experts: 2nd Circuit ‘erred’ in its ruling.

By Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.

When New York repealed religious exemptions in 2019, state health officials cited a measles outbreak in 2018-2019 among students in an Orthodox Jewish community in Rockland County as a key reason for eliminating exemptions.

Today, New York is one of four U.S. states — the others being California, Connecticut and Maine — that do not recognize religious vaccine exemptions. In West Virginia, the issue is the subject of ongoing litigation and political debate.

Other states, including Massachusetts, are considering legislation to end religious vaccination exemptions.

Last year, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the largest pediatric trade group in the U.S., called for an end to religious exemptions.

In upholding New York’s law, the 2nd Circuit said that religious exemptions are “meaningfully different” from medical exemptions, which state law still recognizes.

The court said medical exemptions are granted only with “sufficient” documentation about the child’s medical condition and are limited to specific vaccines. Religious exemptions apply to all vaccinations that schoolchildren are otherwise required to receive.

Greg Glaser, general counsel for Physicians for Informed Consent, a medical group that filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in support of the plaintiffs in Miller v. McDonald, said the 2nd Circuit “erred” in its ruling.

“The State of New York actively favors secular exemptions (medical) while concurrently prohibiting religious exemptions. This unequal treatment directly violates the Equal Protection Clause,” Glaser said.

Michael Kane, director of advocacy for Children’s Health Defense (CHD), said the Supreme Court called on the 2nd Circuit to review its previous ruling in Miller v. McDonald in the context of the Mahmoud v. Taylor decision — yet the 2nd Circuit largely sidestepped that ruling in its decision last week.

“I find it very unlikely that the Supreme Court is going to allow that to be the final word,” Kane said.