
…Clearly this is not the way toy want to die
…He’s the man in the wall
…He’s not some kind of a Perv. He’s just bitter
–

…Clearly this is not the way toy want to die
…He’s the man in the wall
…He’s not some kind of a Perv. He’s just bitter
–

By Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.
The Post reported last month that Miller v. McDonald and other cases challenging efforts to ban religious exemptions in California and West Virginia could result in a “national legal win” for opponents of vaccine mandates.
“If the court does rule in favor of religious exemptions to vaccines, unless there is some caveat to the ruling, a Supreme Court ruling would be binding nationwide and thereby eliminate state action to remove religious exemptions,” said Leslie Manookian, president and founder of the Health Freedom Defense Fund.
One caveat, according to Kane, would be whether the Supreme Court issues a ruling that is applicable only to specific groups, like the Amish, instead of having broader applicability.
“You can’t rule in favor of one religious group to have the right to an exemption but then declare another religious group does not share that same right,” Kane said. “There is a chance the court could rule narrowly on the specifics of this case, but that will be hard in my view. A win for the Amish is likely to be a win for all.”
Another caveat, according to Manookian, is the Supreme Court’s willingness to take on a case involving vaccination.
“I would hope that case ends up at the Supreme Court, but find it difficult to predict what the court will do as it seems committed to avoiding the vaccine issue,” Manookian said.
The cases come at a time when religious exemptions have become a contentious issue in several states and have resulted in conflicting court rulings — a situation Glaser said is confusing for many parents.
“The Miller case highlights a chaotic legal landscape where lawyers and families face direct legislative confusion,” Glaser said. “Lower courts will continue splitting over the Equal Protection Clause until the Supreme Court provides the explicit clarity required.”

by Jim Hᴏft
Jul. 28, 2026 8:15 am
“The Tony Fauci I saw in those emails is not the Tony Fauci I knew,” Gottlieb said, describing the Fauci he knew as supposedly “sober,” “careful,” and “thoughtful.”
Kernen then raised Fauci’s apparent obsession with the corporate media and his cozy relationships with establishment journalists.
“Did you figure out the obsession with mainstream media in defending him?” Kernen asked, mentioning CNN’s Jake Tapper and the media figures who portrayed Fauci as a “hero.”
Gottlieb tried to explain that frightened Americans were looking for a trusted voice during the pandemic.
“Maybe they picked the wrong voice,” he finally admitted.
Kernen fired back by recalling Fauci’s infamous “I represent science” posture and accusing Gottlieb of remaining “very guarded and nice” toward the former government official.
“I was disappointed by the emails, I have to admit,” Gottlieb conceded.
WATCH: Bitchute : Forgotten About Media https://www.bitchute.com/video/jgYfVMeAjDbC
The interview followed Senator Paul’s release of the massive “Tony’s Diary Package,” containing Fauci’s private pandemic-era journal entries and communications.
The documents reveal Fauci’s fascination with his sudden celebrity status, including his excitement over completing what he called the “Fauci 5,” appearances on all five major Sunday television programs.
The Gateway Pundit previously reported that Fauci’s diaries documented his “bizarre obsession with fame” while Americans were dying, businesses were being destroyed, children were locked out of classrooms, and churches were ordered closed.
Another Gateway Pundit report revealed that Fauci privately discussed a COVID fatality rate potentially far lower than the figure he presented to lawmakers.
Paul’s Senate “Reading Room” says Fauci’s private writings show that he was warned by top virologists on January 31, 2020, that the virus contained features raising serious questions about a natural origin. According to the committee, roughly half the scientists on the initial call believed the virus looked “constructed.”
Yet Fauci later publicly dismissed laboratory-origin suspicions while presenting natural spillover as the favored explanation. Fauci disputes accusations that he deliberately misled the public.
–
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/T_NHpvgmB6I/maxresdefault.jpg
Lion of Judah
3.52M subscribers
48,820 views
Jul 23, 2026
Is the world being prepared for a single system of worship?
In this urgent message, we examine the controversy surrounding King Charles’s changing religious role, the rise of interfaith unity, the Abrahamic Family House, and the warning found in Revelation 13.
This sermon does not identify King Charles or any living person as the final Antichrist.
Instead, it explores how the spirit of antichrist weakens the exclusive truth of Jesus Christ and prepares humanity for global worship.
Scripture warns that the coming Beast will demand allegiance. Christians must remain awake, discerning, faithful, and unashamed of the Gospel of Christ.

And sitting on them were those to whom judgment [that is, the authority to act as judges] was given. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony of Jesus and because of the word of God, and those who had refused to worship the beast or his image, and had not accepted his mark on their forehead and on their hand; and they came to life and reigned with Christ for a thousand years.
Footnotes:
👉 Revelation 20:4 A description of the common state of the Church of Christ in earth in that space of a thousand years, for which the devil was in bonds: in which first the authority, life, and common honor of the godly, is declared, verse 4. Secondly, newness of life is preached unto others by the Gospel, after that space, verse 5. Finally, he concludeth with promises, verse 6.
👉 Revelation 20:4 For judgment was committed to them, as to members joined to the head, not [that] Christ’s office was given over [to] them.
👉 Revelation 20:4 This was a type of the authority of the good and faithful servants of God in the Church, taken from the manner of men.
👉 Revelation 20:4 Of the Martyrs, which suffered in those first times.
👉 Revelation 20:4 Of the Martyrs which suffered after that both the beasts were now risen up, Chapter 13, for these three things are expounded.

By Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.
When New York repealed religious exemptions in 2019, state health officials cited a measles outbreak in 2018-2019 among students in an Orthodox Jewish community in Rockland County as a key reason for eliminating exemptions.
Today, New York is one of four U.S. states — the others being California, Connecticut and Maine — that do not recognize religious vaccine exemptions. In West Virginia, the issue is the subject of ongoing litigation and political debate.
Other states, including Massachusetts, are considering legislation to end religious vaccination exemptions.
Last year, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the largest pediatric trade group in the U.S., called for an end to religious exemptions.
In upholding New York’s law, the 2nd Circuit said that religious exemptions are “meaningfully different” from medical exemptions, which state law still recognizes.
The court said medical exemptions are granted only with “sufficient” documentation about the child’s medical condition and are limited to specific vaccines. Religious exemptions apply to all vaccinations that schoolchildren are otherwise required to receive.
Greg Glaser, general counsel for Physicians for Informed Consent, a medical group that filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in support of the plaintiffs in Miller v. McDonald, said the 2nd Circuit “erred” in its ruling.
“The State of New York actively favors secular exemptions (medical) while concurrently prohibiting religious exemptions. This unequal treatment directly violates the Equal Protection Clause,” Glaser said.
Michael Kane, director of advocacy for Children’s Health Defense (CHD), said the Supreme Court called on the 2nd Circuit to review its previous ruling in Miller v. McDonald in the context of the Mahmoud v. Taylor decision — yet the 2nd Circuit largely sidestepped that ruling in its decision last week.
“I find it very unlikely that the Supreme Court is going to allow that to be the final word,” Kane said.

GOD REVEALED
159K subscribers
23,554 views
Apr 24, 2026
The Church has been focused on the wrong detail for decades.
For years, the conversation about the Mark of the Beast has revolved around one number — 666.
But Revelation doesn’t give just one detail… it gives seven.
And when you finally see them together, everything shifts.
This documentary goes beyond speculation and into the text itself — connecting Revelation and Daniel to reveal a deeper, more complete picture that most teachings never address.
This is not about microchips or headlines.
This is about allegiance, worship, and a system designed to replace what God has already established.
What you’ll discover here is not meant to create fear — but clarity, discernment, and preparation.
Because the warning in Scripture is not distant… and it’s not abstract.
👇 Stay until the end — the final revelation changes everything.

@BuzzPatterson
The Tomahawks seem to be the weapon of choice tonight.
We’re raining them down!
Get some!
This is frikking incredible footage.
I’ve personally never seen this intensity.
This is HUGE!🔥
Bitchute : https://www.bitchute.com/video/Svzn5tnv424c
–

By Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.
Last week’s decision was the second time the 2nd Circuit ruled against the plaintiffs. The same court previously dismissed the suit in 2024, upholding a decision by another federal court earlier that year.
In December 2025, the Supreme Court sent the case back to the 2nd Circuit, asking it to review constitutional questions arising out of a separate ruling, Mahmoud v. Taylor, in 2024. In that case, the Supreme Court found that parents have the right to request an exemption for their children from LGBTQ curriculum on religious grounds.
According to The Washington Post, last week’s ruling in Miller v. McDonald may “set the stage for a potential Supreme Court battle over vaccine mandates,” citing legal experts who suggested the court is likely to accept the case for review on constitutional grounds and in light of the Mahmoud v. Taylor decision.
Lawrence Gostin, a Georgetown University professor of health law and an outspoken vaccine proponent, told the Post he expects the Supreme Court to “reverse the appellate court’s decision” if it chooses to review the case.
–
John Kilpatrick
96.8K subscribers

36,043 views
Premiered Jun 14, 2024 Vexed Series
An unclean spirit can vex anyone, including Christians. In a 33-part teaching series, John Kilpatrick identifies evil spirits in Scripture and teaches how you can be free from vexation. Just because an unclean spirit gains entrance does not mean it has a permanent home. Jesus cast out demons, and people were healed!
–