From covid jabs alone, vaccine corporations including Pfizer and Moderna raked in $34 billion in profits last year. This equates to $1,000 a second, according to estimates – this is a lot of cash for something that has never been proven to do anything other than damage the body and lead to early death.
As more “boosters” are rolled out, even more cash will flow into Big Pharma’s coffers. And this would not be possible without the help of Weber Shandwick and its influence on both the CDC and Big Pharma.
The United States already purchased some 171 million doses of the all-new “bivalent” boosters being pushed for the latest variants and sub-variants of the Omicron variant, which many refer to as the Moronic variant.
Children as young as five years old are eligible for bivalent boosting.
We know from an employee’s LinkedIn account that Weber Shandwick’s involvement in this rollout comes from the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD).
“So excited to be starting a new role today!” the employee wrote on the social media platform. “I’m joining Weber Shandwick as an Account Director supporting a contract I know well, at the CDC’s NCIRD!”
Another employee responded to this person by stating: “Welcome back to the team!”
Weber Shandwick has also taken cash from the government in exchange for helping it to promote seasonal flu shots. Some $50 million in taxpayer dollars was spent on that deal, which was forged in 2020, the same year the Fauci Flu appeared.
“Its responsibilities included distributing social media posts and articles promoting vaccines, and sending press releases to the media,” reports En-Volve.com about what Weber Shandwick does for these clients.
“It was also involved in ‘paid media placement,’ a common euphemism for advertising.”
It is important to note that Weber Shandwick appears to have been working for both Pfizer and Moderna at the very same time for their jab campaigns, even though the two are competitors. This, combined with its CDC contracts, represents multiple conflicts of interest all at once.
“This new reporting that CDC had a contract with the same PR firm representing the manufacturers of the COVID-19 vaccine raises serious concerns,” wrote Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), adding that he has repeatedly questioned federal officials about conflicts of interest issues.
“The American people deserve transparency and these conflicts of interest will be thoroughly investigated by our committee next year,” Paul added.
Right now, Weber Shandwick is the world’s second-largest PR firm, according to Provoke Media.
The latest news about Fauci Flu shots can be found at ChemicalViolence.com.
Sources for this article include:
The same public relations firm that was hired by pharmaceutical giants Pfizer and Moderna to promote Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” throughout the plandemic is also embedded within the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), we now know.
Weber Shandwick was awarded a $50 million contract to join the CDC’s “Division of Viral Diseases team,” reports indicate. Its purpose is to boost “health communication,” as that term is loosely defined.
At the very same time, Weber Shandwick has been a Pfizer partner since at least 2006, having worked with the company to elevate its public profile. It also partnered with Moderna in June following the success of that company’s mRNA (messenger RNA) Chinese Virus injection.
What this means is that the same company actively promoting private pharmaceutical interests is also working within a so-called public government agency to direct health policy. This is what is known as a conflict of interest. (Related: Remember when the CDC was caught removing covid jab injury reports from VAERS?)
Newly released data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) shows that around a third of participants who signed up for a voluntary Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine safety monitoring program suffered from significant adverse events, with nearly eight percent of those side effects requiring professional medical care.
The data came from v-safe, a voluntary smartphone-based program created by the CDC specifically to monitor the effects of the COVID-19 vaccines. To sign up, people simply have to download the app onto their smartphones, register and provide periodic health check-ins after receiving COVID-19 vaccines. (Related: CDC data & scientific study suggest 1.2 million Americans may already have died due to COVID vaccination.)
When you see “only 6%” trending on Twitter, the next obvious question is “only 6% of what?” Only 6% of dogs wear shoes? Only 6% of cats are plotting to stage a coup d’état in your house? Only 6% of what Tinder profiles say is true?
Nope. Various Tweets were pulling the 6% number from the following passage on the “Provisional Death Counts for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)” page on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website:
“Table 3 shows the types of health conditions and contributing causes mentioned in conjunction with deaths involving coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned.”
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) raised the threat level of the new monkeypox outbreak and suggested travelers wear masks to prevent transmission of the disease.
None of the airlines have responded to the announcement. For the moment, the decision to wear a mask while traveling appears to be a voluntary one.
To date, there have been 31 confirmed cases nationwide, according to the CDC.
Although the mask suggestion by the health agency follows a similar pattern to its Covid-19 guidance, the two diseases are quite different. Monkeypox is less lethal and less easy to transmit. Indeed, there have been no confirmed deaths in the U.S. from infection.
Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender’s Top News of the Day. It’s free.
By Julie Appleby
The definition of “sanitation.” An old court case that involves an underwear manufacturer. Whether people had a fair chance to express their opinions about wearing masks on planes.
These disparate factors are in the spotlight as the Biden administration challenges a U.S. District Court ruling that overturned a federal mask mandate on public transportation.
The outcome could determine the limits of federal public health officials’ power not only during the COVID-19 crisis but also when the next pandemic hits.
Sound complicated? It is.
About the only thing that’s clear so far is that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s mask requirement for people traveling on planes, trains, and buses is not likely to make a comeback anytime soon.
The Department of Justice’s appeal of the Florida judge’s decision to the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals could take weeks or months.
What might that appeal contain, and why is it important? The government has not yet filed its detailed arguments, so Kaiser Health News spoke with several health law experts about what to expect.
From the start of the pandemic, changing definitions have allowed authorities to manipulate data in whatever way they needed. Now, states are starting to change the way they define a “COVID death,” resulting in lowered mortality rates. In Massachusetts, for example, COVID deaths dropped by 3,700 after the state changed its definition to be in alignment with that of the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists.12
As reported by CBS Boston:13
“The state said currently the COVID death definition includes anyone who has the disease listed as a cause of death on their death certificate. It also includes anyone who had a diagnosis within 60 days but did not have it listed as a cause on their death certificate. Under the new definition, the timeframe is changed to 30 days for people without a COVID diagnosis on their death certificate.”
For the record, counting someone who died of any cause as a COVID death simply because they tested positive within 30 days of their death is still a grossly inaccurate way of determining the true death toll from this virus, because we know PCR tests have a false positive rate of about 97% when run at 35 cycles or greater,14 as was the norm from the start.
Curiously, three months before the CDC started changing its mortality statistics, the U.S. Health and Human Services stopped collecting data on hospitalizations and deaths from COVID-19 altogether. The HHS announced9 changes to the reporting requirements for hospitals and acute care facilities January 6, 2022. The new guidelines, which took effect February 2, note “The retirement of fields which are no longer required to be reported,” which include the “previous day’s COVID-19 deaths.”
What are they trying to hide? Are they stopping the flow of data to prevent examination and analysis? According to some, the HHS hospital data are among the best we have in the U.S., so ending that data collection doesn’t make sense. January 2021, Alex C. Madrigal, co-founder of the COVID Tracking Project, wrote:10
“In a series of analyses that we ran over the past several months, we came to nearly the opposite conclusion of other media outlets. The hospitalization data coming out of HHS are now the best and most granular publicly available data on the pandemic.”
An unnamed federal health official spoke with a reporter from WSWS,11 calling the move to stop reporting COVID-29 hospital deaths “incomprehensible.” The official added:
“It is the only consistent, reliable and actionable dataset at the federal level. Ninety-nine percent of hospitals report 100% of the data every day. I don’t know any scientists who want to have less data.”
Persecution Live 