PURPOSE

This revenue ruling modifies the rules for group trusts described in Rev. Rul. 81-
100, 1981-1 C.B. 326, as clarified and modified by Rev. Rul. 2004-67, 2004-2 C.B. 28.

The modifications revise the generally applicable rules for these group trusts and, if certain requirements are met, permit the participation in group trusts of custodial accounts under § 403(b)(7), retirement income accounts under § 403(b)(9), and governmental retiree benefit plans under § 401(a)(24). In addition, this revenue ruling provides related model language that may be used by group trusts to comply with these new provisions. This revenue ruling also modifies the transition relief provided in Rev. Rul. 2008-40, 2008-2 C.B. 166, relating to plans qualifying under section 1165 of the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code (Puerto Rico Code).

 

 

Why is Joe Biden trying to set Israel on fire?

By publicly putting its prestige and money behind the left-wing coalition that lost the latest Israeli election, the Obama/Biden Regime is openly advertising its desire to bring down Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. U.S. financial support for far-left demonstrations in Tel Aviv isn’t about the future of Israel’s judiciary, it’s about handcuffing Israel while Iran gets the […]

Why is Joe Biden trying to set Israel on fire?

The Quintessential Codependent Sheds Her Patterns….slowly…

These are the writings of a girl who knows a guy not very well and who knows that she is coming to think somewhat obsessively…and wants to reflect on it and pull herself out… What a powerful pattern it is…Codependence “What’s going to happen if I don’t talk to Gave soon? Like right now? He […]

The Quintessential Codependent Sheds Her Patterns….slowly…

US Judge Strikes Down Biden Climate Damage Cost Estimate

A federal judge on Friday blocked the Biden administration’s attempt to put greater emphasis on the potential damage from greenhouse gas emissions when creating rules for polluting industries.

U.S. District Judge James Cain of the Western District of Louisiana sided with Republican attorneys general who said the administration’s raising the cost estimate of carbon dioxide emissions threatened to drive up energy costs while decreasing state revenues from energy production. The judge issued an injunction that bars the administration from using the higher cost estimate, which puts a dollar value on damages caused by every additional ton of greenhouse gases emitted into the atmosphere.

Read More

WHO Waited Two Years to Admit COVID-19 Is Airborne — But Why? The World Health Organization is supposed to be an “expert” when it comes to protecting public health, but it was clueless when it came to letting the public know how SARS-CoV-2 was transmitted.

Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender’s Top News of the Day. It’s free.

Story at a glance:
  • On March 28, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) tweeted, “FACT: #COVID19 is NOT airborne.”
  • Aerosol scientist Lidia Morawska of the Queensland University of Technology in Australia said it was “so obvious” that airborne transmission was occurring, even in Feb. 2020.
  • Morawska and colleagues presented evidence of airborne transmission to the WHO in March 2020, including cases of people becoming infected when they were more than 1 meter from an infected person, and “years of mechanistic studies;” the advice was largely ignored.
  • Nearly two years after the pandemic began, on Dec. 23, 2021, the WHO finally acknowledged that SARS-CoV-2 is airborne.
  • The WHO getting it wrong about SARS-CoV-2’s airborne potential calls into question why it continues to be regarded as a global health authority.

It was March 28, 2020, when the WHO — the supposed global authority on infectious disease — tweeted, “FACT: #COVID19 is NOT airborne.”

The statement included a “fact check” box, authoritatively stating that information circulating on social media that COVID-19 is airborne was “incorrect” and “misinformation.”

“The virus that causes COVID-19 is mainly transmitted through droplets generated when an infected person coughs, sneezes, or speaks,” the WHO wrote. “These droplets are too heavy to hang in the air. They quickly fall on floors or surfaces.”

Read More

Myocarditis following mRNA vaccination against SARS-CoV-2, a case series

Introduction

mRNA COVID-19 vaccines have emerged as a new form of vaccination that has proven to be highly safe and effective against COVID-19 vaccination. Rare adverse events including myocarditis have been reported in the literature.

Methods

Data were gathered from the electronic medical record of four patients personally treated by the authors.

Results

Four patients, ages 20 to 30, presented with myocarditis characterized by chest pain, elevations in troponin-I and C-reactive protein, and negative viral serologies two to four days following mRNA vaccine administration. One had a cardiac MRI showing delayed gadolinium enhancement in a subpericardial pattern. All experienced symptom resolution by the following day, and the two who have returned for follow-up had normal troponin-I and CRP values.

Read More

HERE’S THE LIST: 1,000 Different Studies Show Extensive Evidence of COVID-19 Vaccines Adverse Events

Are you tired of debating with your liberal friends and family on the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine?

Informed Choice Australia made a list of ‘peer-reviewed’ medical papers submitted to various medical journals, showing extensive evidence of adverse events in the COVID-19 vaccines.

The list only includes the studies made up to January 20 concerning the adverse reaction from COVID-19 vaccines, such as myocarditis, thrombosis, thrombocytopenia, vasculitis, cardiac, Bell’s Palsy, immune-mediated disease, and many more.

Read More