Dem States Are Worried They Can’t Pay Out Retirement Benefits

Three high-profile Democratic governors are struggling to stabilize their states’ retirement programs due to a falling stock market and may have difficulties paying out benefits in the coming years, according to Politico.

Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom, Democratic Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker and Democratic New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy, all of whom are considered potential candidates for the 2024 presidential race, have poured billions of dollars into their states’ pension funds, according to Politico. They may struggle to maintain their public images if they’re forced to raise taxes or make budget cuts to keep pension payments flowing.

Read More

JOSEPH R. BIDEN 46th President of the United States: 2021 ‐ present Executive Order 14067—Ensuring Responsible Development of Digital Assets

Joe Biden
March 09, 2022

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1Policy. Advances in digital and distributed ledger technology for financial services have led to dramatic growth in markets for digital assets, with profound implications for the protection of consumers, investors, and businesses, including data privacy and security; financial stability and systemic risk; crime; national security; the ability to exercise human rights; financial inclusion and equity; and energy demand and climate change. In November 2021, non-state issued digital assets reached a combined market capitalization of $3 trillion, up from approximately $14 billion in early November 2016. Monetary authorities globally are also exploring, and in some cases introducing, central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).

While many activities involving digital assets are within the scope of existing domestic laws and regulations, an area where the United States has been a global leader, growing development and adoption of digital assets and related innovations, as well as inconsistent controls to defend against certain key risks, necessitate an evolution and alignment of the United States Government approach to digital assets. The United States has an interest in responsible financial innovation, expanding access to safe and affordable financial services, and reducing the cost of domestic and cross-border funds transfers and payments, including through the continued modernization of public payment systems. We must take strong steps to reduce the risks that digital assets could pose to consumers, investors, and business protections; financial stability and financial system integrity; combating and preventing crime and illicit finance; national security; the ability to exercise human rights; financial inclusion and equity; and climate change and pollution.

Read More

The Vaccine Was “95% Effective” How?

By Robert Blumen | Brownstone Institute | March 8, 2023 The 1840 Treaty of Waitangi between the British Crown and Maori chiefs was a landmark event in the history of New Zealand. Drafted in English, a Maori translation was prepared, ostensibly to ensure that Maori could have an accurate understanding of the terms. In retrospect, it is […]

The Vaccine Was “95% Effective” How?

BIDEN EFFECT: US Marine sniper testifies to Congress that he was denied permission to kill the Kabul Airport ISIS suicide bomber who blew up 13 U.S. military troops

In July 2021, Joe Biden abandoned Afghanistan’s Bagram Airfield in the middle of the night after nearly 20 years of US occupation. The Biden regime shut off the electricity and slipped away in the night without notifying the base’s Afghan commander, who discovered the Americans’ secret departure more than two hours after they left. Later, it…

BIDEN EFFECT: US Marine sniper testifies to Congress that he was denied permission to kill the Kabul Airport ISIS suicide bomber who blew up 13 U.S. military troops

The Believer’s Tools

God provides everything we need to enjoy a close relationship with Him 1 John 1:5-10 As we mature spiritually and gain wisdom from Scripture, we should recognize that confession, repentance, and obedience are necessary tools for maintaining an intimate relationship with God. When the Holy Spirit convicts us of sin, the right response is to […]

The Believer’s Tools

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 401(a) provides that a trust created or organized in the United States and
forming a part of a stock bonus, pension, or profit-sharing plan of an employer for the exclusive benefit of its employees or their beneficiaries is qualified if it meets certain requirements. Section 401(a)(1) provides that one of these requirements is that contributions be made to the trust by the applicable employer or employees, or both, for the purpose of distributing to such employees or their beneficiaries the corpus and income of the fund accumulated in accordance with such plan.

Section 501(a) provides, in part, that a trust described in § 401(a) is exempt from income tax. Section 401(a)(2) provides, in part, that under each trust instrument it must be impossible, at any time prior to the satisfaction of all liabilities with respect to employees and their beneficiaries under the plan and the trust, for any part of the corpus or income of the trust to be used for or diverted to purposes other than for the exclusive benefit of the employees or their beneficiaries.

Similarly, § 408 provides that an IRA means a trust created or organized
“for the exclusive benefit of an individual or his beneficiaries” and § 457(g) provides that the assets of an eligible governmental plan under § 457(b) must be held in trust “for the exclusive benefit of participants and their beneficiaries.”

Section 401(a)(24) provides that any group trust that otherwise meets the
requirements of § 401(a) does not fail to satisfy such requirements due to the
participation or inclusion of the monies of a plan or governmental unit described in § 818(a)(6) in the group trust. Section 818(a)(6) contains special rules regarding the definition of the term “pension plan contract.” Section 818(a)(6)(A) defines the term to include a contract purchased by a governmental plan (within the meaning of § 414(d)) and an eligible governmental plan under § 457(b).

Section 818(a)(6)(B) further defines the term to include a contract purchased by the Government of the United States, the government of any state or political subdivision thereof, or by any agency or instrumentality of the foregoing, or any organization (other than a governmental unit) exempt from tax under subtitle A (income taxes), for use in satisfying an obligation of such government, political subdivision, agency, instrumentality, or organization to provide a benefit under a plan described in § 818(a)(6)(A).1

Section 401(f)(1) provides that a custodial account, an annuity contract, or a
contract (other than a life, health or accident, property, casualty, or liability insurance contract) issued by an insurance company qualified to do business in a State is treated as a qualified trust under § 401 if the custodial account or contract would constitute a qualified trust under § 401, except for the fact that it is not a trust. Section 401(f)(2)

1 The Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA), Pub. L. No. 97-248, added § 401(a)(24) to the Code. With respect to that section, the TEFRA conference report explains that “the tax-exempt status of a group trust will not be adversely affected merely because the trust accepts monies from (a) a retirement plan of a State or local government, whether or not the plan is a qualified plan and whether or not the assets are held in trust, or (b) any State or local government monies for use in satisfying an obligation of such State or local government to provide a retirement benefit under a governmental plan.” H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 760, 97th Cong., 2nd Sess. 81, 1982-2 C.B. 682.

 

ISSUE

Under what conditions may the assets of qualified plans under § 401(a),
individual retirement accounts (IRAs) under § 408 (including Roth IRAs under §408A), and eligible governmental plans under § 457(b) be pooled in a group trust described in Rev. Rul. 81-100 with the assets of custodial accounts under § 403(b)(7), retirement income accounts under § 403(b)(9), and governmental plans under § 401(a)(24) without affecting the tax status of these entities or the group trust?

PURPOSE

This revenue ruling modifies the rules for group trusts described in Rev. Rul. 81-
100, 1981-1 C.B. 326, as clarified and modified by Rev. Rul. 2004-67, 2004-2 C.B. 28.

The modifications revise the generally applicable rules for these group trusts and, if certain requirements are met, permit the participation in group trusts of custodial accounts under § 403(b)(7), retirement income accounts under § 403(b)(9), and governmental retiree benefit plans under § 401(a)(24). In addition, this revenue ruling provides related model language that may be used by group trusts to comply with these new provisions. This revenue ruling also modifies the transition relief provided in Rev. Rul. 2008-40, 2008-2 C.B. 166, relating to plans qualifying under section 1165 of the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code (Puerto Rico Code).