Tag: #Mandates

Breitbart: Uthmeier went on – We’ve got communications, emails with subordinates where he’s asking them to help work on applications for these awards.

We know one award in particular. he made 900,000 on that.

Again, this is separate and independent from his government salary.

So here, you know, government officials they have a lot of immunities.

They have protections when they’re doing their job, but when somebody like Dr. Fauci is lying and deceiving the American people, pushing out directives and mandates that he privately questions as unsafe, and he’s deriving a profit from it, that raises larger legal questions,” Uthmeier said, making it clear that his office wants accountability.

“A lot of people were hurt and suffered, but we respect procedure, rule of law.

We will get to the bottom of it.

We will leave no stone unturned, and we want to find out at the end of the day, you know, was he pursuing profit, or was he trying to protect the people of Florida?

And his diary, it screams of fame and fortune,” he said, noting Fauci was “doubting the risks of myocarditis” and criticizing Florida for not following directives.

“So much so that he traveled down.

He did news hits, radio hits.

He went down with Jill Biden.

All the while, we now know privately he has a lot of doubts about safety [of the vaccine],” Uthmeier pointed out, leading to an admission from Roberts.

“Well, I can tell you, as somebody who nearly died from the booster, I had a lot of doubts about the safety of the vaccine as well,” Roberts said.

Following Fauci’s refusal to answer questions at last week’s Senate panel, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) released a resolution to hold Fauci in contempt of Congress.

The vote is set for Thursday morning.
–

Alberta leadership candidate vows to ban employer vaccine mandates

 

 

‘Tens of thousands were pressured to take the vaccine on threat of losing their job. This was a human rights violation,’ Danielle Smith said.

 

HIGH RIVER, Alberta (LifeSiteNews) – Alberta Premier leadership candidate Danielle Smith said employer vaccine mandates enacted in the province were a “human rights violation” and she promised as leader that she would make it illegal for anyone to be fired because of their vaccine status.

“Thousands of Albertans lost their jobs because they wouldn’t agree to be vaccinated. Tens of thousands were pressured to take the vaccine on threat of losing their job. This was a human rights violation,” Smith tweeted yesterday.

Smith said that with “federal booster mandates looming” there will be many companies who will be “pressured into implementing mandates this fall.”

Read More

Science, Public Health Policy and the Law: ‘A win for the Amish is likely to be a win for all’.

By Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.

The Post reported last month that Miller v. McDonald and other cases challenging efforts to ban religious exemptions in California and West Virginia could result in a “national legal win” for opponents of vaccine mandates.

“If the court does rule in favor of religious exemptions to vaccines, unless there is some caveat to the ruling, a Supreme Court ruling would be binding nationwide and thereby eliminate state action to remove religious exemptions,” said Leslie Manookian, president and founder of the Health Freedom Defense Fund.

One caveat, according to Kane, would be whether the Supreme Court issues a ruling that is applicable only to specific groups, like the Amish, instead of having broader applicability.

“You can’t rule in favor of one religious group to have the right to an exemption but then declare another religious group does not share that same right,” Kane said. “There is a chance the court could rule narrowly on the specifics of this case, but that will be hard in my view. A win for the Amish is likely to be a win for all.”

Another caveat, according to Manookian, is the Supreme Court’s willingness to take on a case involving vaccination.

“I would hope that case ends up at the Supreme Court, but find it difficult to predict what the court will do as it seems committed to avoiding the vaccine issue,” Manookian said.

The cases come at a time when religious exemptions have become a contentious issue in several states and have resulted in conflicting court rulings — a situation Glaser said is confusing for many parents.

“The Miller case highlights a chaotic legal landscape where lawyers and families face direct legislative confusion,” Glaser said. “Lower courts will continue splitting over the Equal Protection Clause until the Supreme Court provides the explicit clarity required.”