The Vigilant Fox: German report sidesteps COVID vaccine adverse events.

July 14, 2026

According to STIKO’s report, severe COVID-19 cases during pregnancy are now rare and healthy pregnant women now face a risk that’s comparable to that of healthy women of the same age group.

STIKO continues to recommend COVID-19 vaccination, however, for pregnant women with diabetes, hypertension, immune deficiency, significant chronic disease or pregnancy-related complications.

Sterz suggested the new policy should have been recommended from the beginning of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout.

“Why was this not the strategy from the very beginning? Vaccination of pregnant women with an unknown, not properly evaluated vaccine was a criminal medical act,” Sterz said.

Sterz cited the “Pfizer documents,” released in 2024 and analyzed by independent researchers. The documents cited vaccine-related deaths, serious adverse events among pregnant women and irreversible harm to reproductive health in the clinical trial data of the original Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 shot.

STIKO’s report does not address adverse events related to COVID-19 vaccination — for pregnant women or any other population group. This despite continuing questions about the safety of the mRNA vaccine technology, which some scientists have said puts people at risk, and calls for their suspension.

Walach suggested that safety concerns likely underlie STIKO’s new guidance, even if those concerns are not spelled out in its report.

“I think it is becoming more and more obvious that the mRNA shots are problematic. Without specifically acknowledging this, this perception likely underlies this recommendation,” Walach said. “There have been multiple calls for the STIKO to change their policy. It seems they have caved in,” Walach said.

An October 2024 survey conducted in Germany found that 1 in 6 respondents reported experiencing side effects after receiving a COVID-19 shot.

Internal RKI documents released by an anonymous whistleblower in July 2024 showed that the organization overlooked COVID-19 vaccine safety concerns, seeking to skip Phase 3 trials of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine and to release the product “straight into broad application.”

The documents also showed that widespread vaccination of children and other pandemic-era policies weren’t based on rational or scientific considerations but on political factors.

Walach said STIKO’s guidance does not go far enough and that it should instead “express a wholesale recommendation to not use mRNA for any vaccine.”

Last month, a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) committee unanimously voted to recommend approval of Moderna’s mRNA flu vaccine for the 50-64 and 65-plus age groups. Full FDA approval is pending.

The Vigilant Fox: Experts say new recommendations don’t go far enough.

July 14, 2026

Several significant developments led STIKO to change its COVID-19 vaccination recommendations, the German newspaper Die Zeit reported.

The rise in hybrid immunity in the population, the declining severity of COVID-19 infections, the continued decrease in deaths and hospitalizations from COVID-19 and the changing nature of SARS-CoV-2 — which now has the characteristics of a seasonal respiratory virus — factored into STIKO’s decision.

STIKO cited the fact that “over 95% of the adult population has broad immunity from past infections or vaccines” as evidence that healthy adults 75 and younger are well-protected against severe COVID-19 infections.

Sterz said that while the new policy vindicates proponents of natural immunity, the effectiveness of this strategy in conferring immunity should not be conflated with the protection purportedly provided by the COVID-19 shots.

“People who have been vaccinated against COVID-19 have never developed a durable, solid immunity against this man-made virus,” Sterz said.

STIKO’s report cited data showing a significant reduction in deaths between the 2023-24 and 2025-26 cold and flu seasons. Hospitalizations declined from approximately 135,000 to 50,000. Deaths dropped from approximately 4,300 to fewer than 900 during the same period.

According to STIKO, of the remaining cases, most occurred in older adults, with approximately 80% of hospitalizations and 97% of deaths occurring among people age 60 or over. The burden was highest among people 80 years old and up.

The new recommendations are “a step in the right direction,” said internal medicine physician Dr. Clayton J. Baker. But he suggested that even the population groups identified as being at risk don’t need annual boosters.

He said that continuing to recommend the shots for people 75 and older “perpetuates the false notion that seasonal respiratory viruses require annual ‘boosters,’ a falsehood that is borne out by the abysmal record of the annual influenza vaccine.”

Sterz suggested that declining hospitalizations and deaths, officially attributed to the declining severity of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and widespread hybrid immunity, are actually due to the decreased uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine.

“Perhaps it’s because people became more and more reluctant to get the jab,” Sterz said.

According to RKI data cited by Eurosurveillance, only 20.9% of people ages 60 or over in Germany received a COVID-19 vaccine during the 2024-25 cold and flu season, despite the country’s official guidance.

These data contrast with RKI figures showing that 85.3% of adults 60 and over had received the first booster dose and 39% received a second booster dose.

Sterz suggested that German public health authorities have long overstated the severity and risk of COVID-19. “I would say that this was the case from the very beginning. The pandemic was mainly created by (false-positive) PCR test results,” Sterz said.

A peer-reviewed study co-authored by Walach and published last year in Frontiers in Epidemiology found that only about 1 in 7 positive PCR tests in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic indicated an actual coronavirus infection that triggered an antibody response.

Like Baker, Sterz suggested that the “at-risk” groups for which STIKO continues to recommend COVID-19 vaccination should opt not to get vaccinated. Sterz highlighted the potential risks of mRNA vaccines.

“The immune system of these people must be boosted by natural ways and not weakened by a non-efficient and dangerous vaccine,” Sterz said.

The Vigilant Fox: Germany Ends COVID Vaccine Recommendation for Healthy People.

July 14, 2026

As of last week, Germany is no longer recommending COVID-19 shots for healthy people under age 75, including pregnant women.

As of last week, Germany is no longer recommending COVID-19 shots for healthy people under age 75, including pregnant women. The new recommendations mark a significant departure from the country’s previous guidance, which called for annual boosters for adults 60 and over.

According to Germany’s Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO), routine COVID-19 vaccination is no longer necessary for healthy adults because most people have developed hybrid immunity — through vaccination, infection or both — and severe COVID-19 infections are now uncommon outside high-risk groups.

COVID-19 shots are still recommended for adults 75 and over, high-risk individuals, residents of long-term care facilities, some healthcare workers and individuals who care for people at high risk of infection, and pregnant women who have significant medical risk factors or pregnancy complications.

The new guidance is “an acknowledgment, indirectly, that further vaccinations are not useful,” because natural immunity is effective at protecting the population against infection, said Harald Walach, Ph.D., founder and director of the Change Health Science Institute in Germany and professorial research fellow at Kazimieras Simonavicius University in Lithuania.

“Better late than not at all,” Walach said.

German toxicologist Helmut Sterz, previously a researcher for major pharmaceutical companies, called the new guidance a “political charade” by the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), Germany’s equivalent of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the parent organization of STIKO.

Sterz said the “government-dependent RKI” adopted the new recommendations because it “can no longer go on with telling the population lies” about the safety or necessity of the COVID-19 shots.

The changes come amid a decline in COVID-19 vaccine uptake in several European countries. The decline led Pfizer to sue Poland and Romania and freeze some of their funds after those governments canceled their contracts for COVID-19 vaccine doses, citing low demand.

New York Post: Investigation launched into extremely rare cancer striking kids in CA enclave: ‘Deeply concerning

By Zain Khan
Published July 14, 2026, 4:40 p.m. ET

Families in an affluent Southern California community are being urged to come forward as attorneys launch an investigation into an alarming number of rare childhood cancer cases.

Bond Legal said it is confidentially gathering information from those whose children lived in or regularly visited Ladera Ranch in Orange County and were diagnosed with Ewing sarcoma or other childhood cancers.

The probe comes after at least six children connected to the master-planned community have been diagnosed since 2013, according to affected families.

“Several representatives from the California Cancer Registry, the UCI Cancer Center, and the Orange County Agricultural Commissioner’s Office met after the County Health Officer initiated outreach in response to ongoing community concerns earlier this year,” the Orange County Heath Care Agency told the Post in a statement.

“The group agreed to conduct an updated review of cancer data. Findings from this analysis will be shared in upcoming weeks with the County Health Officer as soon as they are available,” they added.

The rare bone and soft tissue cancer affects only about 200 to 240 children and teens nationwide each year, according to the American Cancer Society.

“The concentration of cases in a single community is deeply troubling, especially to those who live there,” said Candice Bond, managing partner of Bond Legal.

The Post has also reached out to the Orange County Health Care Agency for comment. According to residents, the agency has said it is looking into the matter.

The law firm said it is seeking information from parents whose children lived in or frequently visited Ladera Ranch, attended local schools, churches, parks, camps or sports facilities, and were diagnosed with Ewing sarcoma, osteosarcoma, leukemia, lymphoma or another rare childhood cancer.

It is also asking families to share information about possible exposure to pesticides, herbicides, contaminated soil or water, construction materials or other environmental hazards.

“Families deserve transparency about what their children may have been exposed to,” Bond said. “When rare cancers appear in clusters, every environmental factor — no matter how routine it may seem — must be examined carefully.”

Bond Legal stressed that multiple cancer diagnoses alone do not establish that a particular exposure caused the illnesses and said any legal claims would require reliable scientific, medical and factual evidence.

The firm said its investigation could examine historical pesticide and herbicide applications, landscaping and pest-control practices, soil and groundwater conditions, former agricultural land uses, imported fill materials, schools and parks, nearby commercial operations and public records.

The California Department of Public Health said its California Cancer Registry evaluates possible cancer clusters by comparing the number of cases diagnosed in a specific community over a defined period with the number that would normally be expected in a similarly sized population based on statewide cancer rates, age groups and time periods.

“An apparent increase in a small area does not, by itself, establish that a cluster exists or that a common cause is present,” the department said.

The renewed attention follows months of advocacy by local parents who have questioned whether extensive pesticide and herbicide use throughout the 4,000-acre community could be contributing to the illnesses.

Residents have spent months researching public records, documenting landscaping practices and pressing officials for greater transparency about the chemicals being used throughout the neighborhood.

Attorney and Ladera Ranch resident Jackie French previously told The California Post that records appeared to show numerous pesticide and herbicide applications throughout the community, prompting residents to call for a transition toward organic landscaping methods.

Researchers have previously explored possible links between pesticide exposure and certain childhood cancers, including Ewing sarcoma, but no direct causal relationship has been established.

Public health authorities have not identified a specific environmental cause, and officials have not linked Ladera Ranch’s landscaping practices to the reported illnesses.

One family’s tragedy has become the face of the community’s campaign for answers.

Brody Matteson was diagnosed with Ewing sarcoma in August 2024 at age 17. After undergoing treatment, he later developed acute myeloid leukemia as a complication of that treatment and died on March 22.

Following his death, his mother, Megan Matteson, posted in a community Facebook group asking whether other local families had experienced cancer diagnoses, helping reignite concerns among residents who believed the cases warranted further investigation.

The issue has also drawn the attention of state lawmakers.

Assemblywoman Kate Sanchez said she is working with state and local agencies after learning of the reports.

“Like many of you, I have read the recent reports regarding cancer cases in Ladera Ranch and the concerns being raised by families about pesticide use in our community,” Sanchez said in a statement.

“As a mom and as your Assemblywoman, these reports are deeply concerning. My heart is with every family that has been affected.”

Sanchez said her office is “actively gathering information, engaging with the appropriate state and local agencies, and reviewing what is known.”

“If there are unanswered questions, they must be addressed through a transparent, science-based process,” she said.

The Republican lawmaker pledged to continue advocating for “a thorough review of the available information, open communication with the community, and full transparency from every entity involved.”

“If changes in law or oversight are needed to better protect our neighborhoods, I will not hesitate to pursue them,” Sanchez added. “The health and safety of our children must always come first.”

Environmental health experts have also said the concerns deserve careful review, even though no direct link has yet been established.

Bruce Blumberg, an environmental health expert at the University of California, Irvine, previously told The California Post that communities should minimize pesticide use whenever possible.

“If I were a parent living in that area, I would be strongly advocating for elimination of pesticide use,” Blumberg said. “In my opinion, it is unreasonable to risk people’s health for the cosmetic elimination of weeds and unwanted vegetation.”

Blumberg noted that many California cities have already adopted organics-first landscape management programs and argued that safer alternatives should be used whenever practical.

Meanwhile, the management company overseeing the unincorporated area of Ladera Ranch said it is establishing an ad hoc advisory committee to review its landscape maintenance practices and identify opportunities for improvement.

“As part of our commitment to transparency and community engagement, the Board has directed staff to establish an ad hoc advisory committee comprised of homeowners, Board members, staff, and landscape professionals. The committee will review our landscape maintenance practices, evaluate opportunities for continued improvement, and provide recommendations for the Board’s consideration.” Ladera Ranch Maintenance Corporation (LARMAC) told the Post.

“We understand why residents are seeking answers, and we recognize the concern that recent media coverage has generated throughout our community,” they added, noting “we are not aware of any determination by those agencies identifying a specific environmental cause or linking the Association’s landscape management practices to these illnesses.”

A UN system stretched to its limits

The strain of these transnational challenges on the UN system is stretching the organization to its breaking point. There are currently 16 peacekeeping operations deployed around the world – nine of them in Africa, three in the Middle East, two in Europe and one in the Americas. There are currently more blue helmets on the ground than at any time in history. The cost of keeping over 125,000 personnel in the field hovers at roughly $8 billion a year.

 

Source: Telegraph; figures are based on 2015 data and the UN peacekeeping budget has since been revised to $8.27 billion (around £5.7 billion at today’s exchange rate)

 

The mounting sense of disorder is shaping how the world’s political and military leaders are thinking about international peace and security. Some of them are calling for a return to isolationism: focus on humanitarian relief to global hot spots and little else. Others are clamouring for more muscular forms of intervention, especially to snuff out radical extremism in North Africa and the Middle East. The space for moderation and balance is shrinking.

Faced with this ominous state of affairs, what is the UN to do?

Read More

A new UN for a new global order

All of these recommendations are eminently sensible. UN member states would do well to act on them immediately. It is worth recalling that we’ve seen some of them before. Back in 2000, the Brahimi Report on peace operations made some of the same points, not least the importance of political solutions over military ones, matching peacekeeping needs with resources, increased coherence in UN responses to emergencies, and stronger partnerships to deliver results.

Read More

“I’m sorry” – the fix for offense and guilt

If they have a change of heart, and repent … forgive your people, who have sinned against you; forgive all the offenses they have committed against you (1 Kings 8:22-53 GWT)

Read More

“I love” – the fix for hatred and animosity

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. (John 3:16 KJV)

Read More

“I believe” – the fix for ignorance and wickedness

It was because of his faith that Enoch was promoted to the eternal world without experiencing death. He disappeared from this world because God promoted him, and before that happened his reputation was that “he pleased God”. And without faith it is impossible to please him. The man who approaches God must have faith in two things, first that God exists and secondly that it is worth a man’s while to try to find God. (Hebrews 11:5-6 PHILLIPS)

Read More

Biden says monkeypox cases something to ‘be concerned about’

President Biden said the increasing spread of monkeypox, which has been detected in the United States and Europe, is something “to be concerned about.”

Biden was asked during a stop in South Korea on Sunday what his health advisers have been telling him about the disease that rarely spreads beyond Africa.

“They haven’t told me the level of exposure yet, but it is something that everybody should be concerned about,” he told reporters at Osan Air Base before boarding Air Force One for a flight to Japan.

Read More